Critics Accuse President Trump of Violating His Oath Over National Guard Threat to Chicago

President Trump sparked outrage after saying he has the authority to send the National Guard into Chicago even without state approval. “I’m the President of the United States. If I think our country is in danger … I can do it. No problem,” he declared during a news briefing.

Critics argue such statements fly directly in the face of the presidential oath to uphold the Constitution—and reveal a troubling belief that the presidency places him above the law.

Chicago Officials Push Back Hard

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker was swift to react, condemning the remarks as an “un-American power grab” and signaling that the state would take immediate legal action. “Mr. President, do not come to Chicago,” Pritzker insisted, calling the proposed deployment unnecessary and politically motivated.

Meanwhile, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson labeled the threat “the most flagrant violation of our Constitution,” rejecting the notion of a military occupation of the city.

Legal and Historical Limits on Force

Legal experts emphasize that federal troops cannot perform law enforcement unless specific statutes are invoked, such as the Insurrection Act or emergency declarations sanctioned by Congress. Retired Illinois National Guard leader Maj. Gen. Richard Hayes flagged that even if deployed, Guard members would be severely restricted—limited to protecting federal facilities, with no authority to enforce local law.

This distinction underscores the constitutional boundary between federal military powers and civilian policing.

A Broader Pattern of Escalating Federal Force

This is not an isolated case. In 2025, several large-scale deployments unfolded, including National Guard units sent to Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.

Plans are reportedly in motion to extend such actions to New York, Baltimore, San Francisco, and more. Critics accuse the administration of exploiting public safety to advance political posturing rather than policy solutions.

Democrats Warn of a Dangerous Precedent

Illinois leaders and national figures alike view Trump’s approach as a politicization of military power. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries accused the administration of manufacturing crises to justify overreach, while legal scholars warn that this marks a severe erosion of democratic norms.

Grassroots voices, too, are alarmed—seeing Trump’s actions as a charter for authoritarianism, especially when targeted at Democratic-led urban areas with falling crime rates.

You might also want to read: Trump Gets Caught Lying by Governor Wes Moore