Katy Perry Sues 85-Year-Old Veteran for $5 Million
© CC BY 2.0
The conflict centers on a luxury home in Montecito, California — originally owned by Carl Westcott, an 85-year-old disabled U.S. Army veteran. In 2020, Katy Perry (and at the time her partner) agreed to buy the estate for $15 million.
But days after signing the sale documents, Westcott tried to back out. He claimed that due to pain medication after back surgery — and declining health — he lacked the mental capacity to understand the contract at the time of sale.
That attempt to rescind triggered a prolonged legal battle. In May 2024, a judge ruled in Perry’s favor, finding no credible evidence that Westcott lacked capacity during the sale
Why Katy Perry Is Now Seeking Millions
With the sale legally upheld, Perry’s team has now filed what’s essentially a countersuit: they’re demanding almost $5 million in damages. The breakdown — according to court filings — includes: around $3.5 million for lost rental income (since the legal fight delayed any leasing or use of the property), roughly $1.34 million for repair and maintenance costs the house allegedly needed, plus legal fees and other related expenses.
Perry argues that because the sale dragged on due to Westcott’s attempt to void the deal, she suffered financially, both in terms of lost income and additional costs to get the mansion ready.
Why People Are Calling It a David-and-Goliath Fight
The lawsuit has sparked public backlash and ethical questions. Many critics point out the stark imbalance: a world-famous pop star vs. an elderly, disabled veteran reportedly in poor health.
On social media and in public commentary, there’s growing concern that the case feels less like a legitimate business dispute and more like a wealthy individual “going after” a vulnerable person, which raises uncomfortable moral and reputational issues for Perry.
On the other hand, supporters of Perry’s side argue that the contract was fair and legally binding; by 2024, a court had already upheld the sale. They say Westcott’s attempt to rescind the deal years after signing — allegedly while under the influence of medication — created a legitimate financial burden that shouldn’t be ignored.
What’s Next — Court Battles and Public Opinion
With damages being pursued and tensions high, the case remains a flashpoint in public debate over celebrity power, age, illness, property law, and fairness. It isn’t just a real-estate lawsuit — it’s become a cultural moment.
For Westcott, the dispute has reportedly taken a toll on his health and reputation. His supporters — including family members — argue the case is more about pressure and privilege than justice.
For Perry, regardless of legal merits, the optics are bad: many say this lawsuit risks damaging her public image by portraying her as targeting someone vulnerable.
You might also want to read: Katy Perry and Justin Trudeau Make Their Romance Official
