Epstein Files Email Suggests Jeffrey May Have Had a Secret Child

As part of the ongoing release of millions of pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Department of Justice, a previously unseen email has surfaced that appears to congratulate Epstein on the birth of a “baby boy.”

Included in the tranche of released materials, the message has sparked fresh speculation about whether Epstein — the late financier and convicted sex offender — may have fathered a child that was never publicly known.

What the Email to Epstein Says

The email, dated September 21, 2011, appears to have been sent to Epstein by someone identifying herself as “Sarah.” In the message, she wrote that she had “heard from The Duke that you have had a baby boy,” and offered “love, friendship, and congratulations” on what she understood to be Epstein’s new child.

The sender’s signature — “Sarah xx” — has led many observers to connect the message to Sarah Ferguson, the former Duchess of York and ex-wife of Prince Andrew (now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor), given their appearances in other emails released in the documents. The reference to “The Duke” in the email further fuels that interpretation.

However, the context is unclear — the email does not include details about the child, its mother, any confirmation from Epstein himself, or any official records tied to the alleged birth. It is simply a message of congratulations based on information attributed to a third party.

Speculation vs. Verification

While the email has generated widespread attention, there is no confirmed evidence that Epstein ever fathered a child. Epstein’s younger brother, Mark Epstein, has previously denied that Jeffrey had any children, stating that he would have known if his brother did. No authenticated legal documents, birth records or verified statements support the existence of a secret son or other offspring.

Indeed, over the years, dozens of people have claimed to be Epstein’s offspring in hopes of a share of his estate — a pattern that is not uncommon where wealthy estates and public attention intersect — but none of those claims have been validated.

Experts caution that an email alone does not prove paternity. It is simply a communication contained in the DOJ’s released archive, which includes millions of pages, emails and files of varying provenance and context, not all of which are verified.

Why This Email to Epstein Matters

If the message is genuine and refers to a real child, the unnamed boy would be about 14 or 15 years old today. A claim of this nature adds another layer to the complex and controversial public history around Epstein’s personal life — which already includes his sex trafficking convictions, financial networks and associations with influential figures.

At the same time, critics and analysts note that raw releases like the DOJ’s files contain many references that are unverified and sometimes speculative. Officials have emphasised this point repeatedly as researchers and journalists sift through the enormous body of material made public.

The possibility that Epstein had children — especially a child born after his 2008 conviction — would raise profound ethical and legal questions. However, the current evidence remains circumstantial and unconfirmed without corroboration from independent records or testimonies.

You might also want to read: Musk, Prince Andrew, and Others in Newly Released Epstein Files