Alabama Executes Anthony Boyd by Nitrogen Gas

On October 23, 2025, the State of Alabama executed death-row inmate Anthony Boyd, 54, by means of nitrogen gas—a method increasingly controversial among rights groups and legal authorities.

Boyd, convicted in 1995 for the 1993 murder of Gregory Huguley, maintained his innocence until his final moments.

The Crime and the Conviction

Boyd was one of four men found guilty of kidnapping Gregory Huguley after Huguley allegedly failed to pay a $200 drug debt. Moreover, prosecutors stated the victim was doused in gasoline and set on fire.

His sentence stemmed from a jury verdict of 10–2 in favour of death (Alabama being one of the few states to allow non-unanimous death penalty jury votes). Despite the conviction, Boyd consistently claimed he was not involved and called for justice system reform.

The Execution Method and Controversy

Additionally, the execution was carried out at the William C. Holman Correctional Facility using nitrogen hypoxia—essentially forcing the inmate to breathe pure nitrogen, which displaces oxygen, causing asphyxiation.

This was part of Alabama’s broader adoption of the method after challenges obtaining lethal-injection drugs. Boyd had litigated against the method, arguing it violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishment.”

Liberal justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, including Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented sharply, describing the process as conscious suffocation and urging the public to time the minutes of the mask’s nitrogen flow.

What It Means

• Capital punishment debate: Boyd’s execution highlights growing concerns about new methods of execution and whether they meet constitutional standards for humanity.
• Legal precedent: Alabama is among the very few states implementing nitrogen executions, meaning the outcome may influence future litigation and state policy.
• Justice system questions: Boyd’s persistent claims of innocence, combined with the non-unanimous jury verdict and the controversial method, raise broader questions about fairness, evidence, and the death penalty.
• Public and international scrutiny: The visible physical reactions reported in previous nitrogen executions (gasping, convulsions) have drawn criticism from human-rights organisations and foreign observers.

What to Watch Next

• Whether further federal or state court challenges succeed in arguing that nitrogen hypoxia is unconstitutional.
• Whether other states adopt or abandon nitrogen gas as a method in light of this case.
• Whether the justice system in Alabama reviews or reforms its use of non-unanimous jury verdicts for death sentences.
• Whether this case influences public opinion and legislative action around the death penalty method and practice.

You might also want to read: London Woman Gets Fined for Pouring Coffee Down in Drain