Donald Trump Slams Greta Thunberg After Israel News

Donald Trump recently aimed at climate activist Greta Thunberg, calling her a “troublemaker,” “crazy,” and saying she’s got anger issues.

His comments came in response to Thunberg’s deportation from Israel — part of a wider removal of international activists involved in a flotilla aiming to challenge the Gaza blockade.

The Context: What Happened to Greta in Israel?

Greta Thunberg was among around 170 activists deported from Israel (out of some 479 detained) after participating in the Global Sumud Flotilla, an effort to break what the organizers call an illegal maritime siege on Gaza and open a humanitarian corridor. The move was controversial, with accusations of mistreatment by authorities.

After being deported, Thunberg appeared in Athens, where she received flowers and support from onlookers. Meanwhile, Trump reacted on live camera, critiquing her public persona and mental state.

Trump’s Take: Harsh Words and Justifications

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump said she’s “no longer into the environment now,” calling her a “troublemaker” who needs help with anger management. He doubled down: “She’s so angry, she’s so crazy.” He also suggested that Thunberg see a psychologist.

Trump didn’t stop there. Trump used the moment to discuss broader geopolitics, praising countries that have helped mediate in Gaza — Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE — and remarking that he believed everyone “wants it to happen” (i.e., peace).

Greta’s Response

Thunberg answered back on Instagram with a gentle jab. She thanked Trump for his “flattering opinions” on her character, then extended a bit of satire: she’d welcome his recommendations for dealing with “anger management problems,” pointing out she sees a pattern in his own public behavior.

In a broader sense, her response suggested that while she does not shy from confrontation, she’s comfortable calling out personal attacks — especially ones wrapped in “concern.”

Bigger Picture: Activism, Politics, and Public Discourse Around Greta

This exchange underscores how contemporary activism and political leadership can clash sharply — especially when personalities become focal points instead of policies.

• Symbolic power vs. political weight: Thunberg commands a large symbolic influence, but whether that translates into structural change in global politics is always uncertain.
• Tone wars: Personal attacks, mental health jabs, and public shaming are more common now. These tactics may distract from the substance.
• Public expectations: Many believe public figures should hold themselves to a higher standard of discourse. Others argue that politics has always included strong rhetoric.

At its heart, this story is less about Trump vs. Thunberg than about how political conversations are conducted today — between activists and power-holders, across media cycles, and under the glare of public opinion.

You might also want to read: Donald Trump Recalls Final Call From Charlie Kirk