Julia Fox Stands By Bloody Jackie Kennedy Outfit

Julia Fox is defending her controversial Halloween look — a recreation of Jackie Kennedy’s blood-stained pink suit from the day JFK was assassinated — after widespread criticism.

Fox says her outfit was not “just a costume” but a “statement” meant to evoke trauma, power, and resistance.

The Julia Fox Costume & Backlash

At a Halloween party on October 30 hosted by Julio Torres, Fox appeared in a pink suit drenched in fake blood, complete with a matching pillbox hat and gloves — mirroring the outfit Jackie Kennedy wore on November 22, 1963, when her husband was shot.

The look triggered harsh responses online, with critics calling it “insensitive,” “disrespectful,” or worse. Among those condemning it was Jackie’s grandson, Jack Schlossberg, who called the costume “disgusting, desperate, and dangerous,” accusing Fox of glorifying political violence.

Fox’s Defense: A Statement, Not a Gimmick

Fox responded via Instagram, explaining that she wasn’t dressing up “as a costume, but as a statement.” She invoked Jackie Kennedy’s refusal to change out of her blood-soaked clothes after the assassination, saying, “I want them to see what they’ve done.”

In her post, she framed the imagery as a “haunting juxtaposition” of beauty and horror, poise and devastation. Her intent: to spotlight trauma, power, and how femininity itself is a form of resistance.

Some fans and followers supported Fox’s framing, praising her for trying to push the conversation. Others held firm in their disapproval, citing the sensitivity surrounding political violence and how closely the real events remain in collective memory.

The Broader Stakes & Sensitivities

This isn’t merely about a spooky outfit. The controversy touches on deeper questions:

• Symbolic weight vs shock value: When does invoking historical trauma become disrespectful rather than thought-provoking?
• Public memory & family legacy: The Kennedy assassination is still a potent, painful event in American history. Fox’s choice to reimagine that visual has to contend with how survivors, descendants, historians, and the public perceive the sanctity of that imagery.
• Art, outrage, and intention: Celebrity stunts often walk a line between provocative art and offense. Whether something is “legible” as a political or emotional statement depends heavily on context, tone, and audience reception.
• Celebrity responsibility: When public figures repurpose real historical pain, their decisions are scrutinized not just for creativity, but for moral sensitivity.

What to Watch

• Whether any surviving Kennedy family members or institutions (e.g., the Kennedy Library) respond further.
• How Fox’s costume choice affects her public perception — will this be remembered as a bold statement or a misstep?
• Whether this sparks more cautious thinking among celebrities doing historically themed costumes in the future.
• How media and historians treat such creative reimaginings, whether they become part of the dialogue or are dismissed as mere provocation.

You might also want to read: Julia Fox Comes Out as Lesbian in Hilarious TikTok Video