Man Allegedly Robs Bank, Forces Date to Be Getaway Driver

What began as a hopeful romantic meeting turned criminal in an instant: a woman in Massachusetts alleges that after meeting her date via an app, he robbed a bank — and coerced her into being his escape driver.

The incident stunned observers and raised questions about trust, coercion, and digital dating dangers.

The Date That Went Wrong

According to reports, the woman and her date drove together to Quincy, Massachusetts, where she believed they would run errands. Instead, he instructed her to pull over near a bank. He then ran inside, brandishing a gun and demanding money from tellers.

After fleeing with cash in hand, he apparently directed her to drive away — making her, unwillingly, part of the getaway. The woman reportedly became his “unexpected getaway driver.”

Law enforcement eventually apprehended him. He is said to have resisted arrest, spat at officers, and asserted his weapon was unloaded.

Legal & Ethical Questions

The case blurs the line between victim and participant. While the woman may have driven the car, the context suggests coercion: she was not a willing accomplice but was placed in an unsafe, high-pressure situation.

From a legal standpoint, courts often assess intent and duress. If a person is forced under threat, their legal culpability is significantly mitigated.

Dating Apps, Risk & Red Flags

This scenario underscores risks that lurk in meeting strangers via dating platforms:

• Trust vs caution: We hope for chemistry, but first-date boundaries & safety are crucial.
• Warning signs overlooked: In hindsight, there may have been red flags, such as overly controlling language, strange route changes, and insistence on isolated locations.
• Power imbalance: The date had control over the setting (where to drive, when to stop); that control quickly turned dangerous.
• Isolation in transit: Being in a car with someone you barely know removes escape options and increases vulnerability.

What to Watch Moving Forward

• The woman’s willingness or ability to testify and how prosecutors frame her role (victim, coerced accomplice, or witness).
• Charges against the man include robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, and potentially abduction.
• Broader discourse about safety in app-based dating: will platforms or law enforcement adapt guidelines?
• Whether the case spurs calls for more public awareness of coercion, especially in “first date gone wrong” scenarios.

You might also want to read: Mother and Daughter Say They Got Pregnant by Same Man