Ohio Man Accidentally Buys Entire Street for $5,000

Jason Fauntleroy thought he was buying a vacant plot in Trenton, Ohio, in 2021 to build a home. The auction listing didn’t mention otherwise, so his $5,000 bid seemed like a solid deal.

But when the deed arrived, Fauntleroy realized he’d actually purchased the entire private street—Bloomfield Court—including the road that services five other occupied homes.

Unexpected Ownership Comes with Responsibility

Rather than owning dozens of houses, Fauntleroy owned the private cul-de-sac itself. A homeowner association had previously maintained it, but now the head of maintenance and liability fell squarely on him.

That means plowing snow, fixing potholes, and dealing with wear and holding responsibility for a roadway used by others.

A Legal Fight Over Eminent Domain

Fast forward three years, and the city of Trenton launched eminent domain proceedings to turn the private street into a public roadway—something Fauntleroy has no objection to, provided he’s fairly compensated.

But he alleges the city is undervaluing the property by only appraising the lot he thought he bought, not the street he actually owns. He says the process has been frustrating and secretive, with him struggling to even get in touch with city officials.

Feeling Shut Out

Attempts to engage city leadership have left Fauntleroy feeling ignored, claiming his calls were blocked and emails unanswered.

He wants the city to honor his legal rights and deliver “just compensation” as required under Ohio law. Fauntleroy’s position is that, even though the road may serve public purposes now, he still deserves its full market value.

Precedent and Property Rights

Ohio’s use of eminent domain has long sparked debate. In past cases—including one that reached the state Supreme Court—property rights advocates have warned against sweeping valuations that undervalue or ignore unique conditions.

Fauntleroy’s case raises questions about auction disclosures, transparency, and the limits of eminent domain powers.

What’s at Stake

This unusual situation could cost Fauntleroy far more than $5,000. If the city prevails, he could lose ownership of a piece of land without receiving proper payment.

At the same time, it highlights gaps in how property auctions are managed and the importance of legal clarity in zoning and transfer descriptions. The road ahead promises legal complexity—as well as wider implications for property buyers in small-town America.

You might also want to read: Passengers Send “Goodbye” Texts as Plane Explodes Mid-Air